Digital Aristotle?

The perspective outlined in this video is amazing. Nonetheless, I think there si place for teachers in the future, although very different teachers than today.
In fact, internet is very good for teaching notions (the boring part of teaching), but is very poor in teaching language. If you want to master a discipline, it is not sufficient to knows what is known i the field, you must be literate in that discipline. And probably in the future teachers should concentrate more on teaching the language than the notions (altthough the two are stngly intertwined).
Currently, I spend more time on youtube than on books and papers for studying (and I study many hours every day), bui 1) I have strong cultural bases, so I can otient myselef in the jungle of youtube 2) I have a method for sorting out useful from unuseful or wrong information 3) I am literate in many fields of science, politics and economics. Wihtous these abilities it is difficult to ezzploit fully the huge potential of the internet. Aristotle didn't teach notions, he taught a methods. Teachers are very rarely Aristotle, in the age of itnernet they need to become.

What the internet lacks (for the moment) is itneraction. Plato taught us that the best way to master the spirit of things is to dialogue with a philosopher. If you don't speak, you cannot learn a language. Of course experienced reader can dialogue with mute things, like books and sources, and this is the essence of literacy,.but you first need to become literate. In my experience very few teachers are able to answer the questions of students and the number of philosophers is avnishingly small (as pointed out in the video); in a good faculty you probably find one or two.